Please select your home edition
Edition
SW newsletters (top)

Gladwell's Line: Sailing's Brexit continues at Bermuda

by Richard Gladwell, Sail-World.com/nz 31 Oct 2019 15:59 NZDT 24 October 2019
One of the test team makes sailing the Starboard iFoil look as difficult as driving Miss Daisy - World Sailing - Windsurfer Evaluation, Lago di Garda, Italy. September 29, 2019 © Jesus Renedo / Sailing Energy / World Sailing

This week, Sailing's Brexit, otherwise known as the 2024 Olympic classes selection, continues for yet another round at the World Sailing Annual Conference in Bermuda.

Several key decisions are on the agenda.

The first is the choice of Equipment for the Men's and Women's Windsurfing event and whether the incumbent RS:X, will retain its place.

That call was to have been made at the May 2019 Mid-Year Meeting, but the World Sailing's Board had three times rejected a recommendation from its expert Equipment Committee to at least hold trials for the Windsurfing Equipment. However, the Council did not agree with the Board's re-nomination of the RS:X for 2024, and called for a set of Evaluation Trials to be held, ready for a decision this week.

The trials at Lake Garda appeared to be well conducted with an excellent panel of sailors in the 20 strong test team. While some of the criteria for the new Equipment, such as being able to race in 35kts, were not met, the gear was tested in winds of up to 25kts.

The upshot of the Evaluation was that the majority of the sailors in the trial opted for foiling over planing boards, and for the Starboard iFoil over the other two options the Windfoil and Formula Foil.

Perhaps the most telling statistic was that the RS:X was scored with more disadvantages than advantages from the sailors who made up the test panel (13 points for, and 14 points against). The Starboard iFoil had 17 Advantages compared to 11 Disadvantages.

RS:X sailors dominated the Evaluation Team, and if there was ever a group with a vested interest in seeing the RS:X anointed for 2024, this was it. The salient point is that the Evaluation Team backed the windfoiler choice, even though individually it would lose them money in their current RS:X equipment investment.

The consensus from the three foiling options was that they didn't much care, which of them was chosen, provided it was a foiler - presumably on the basis that a rising tide lifts all boats. In the end, it was decided that a one-design option was most likely to be accepted, despite the higher cost.

Read the full report of the Evaluation Trial sailing.org/tools/documents/2024WindsurferEvaluationReport

Assuming the Windfoil does receive the blessing of Council, four of the ten events at Marseille will be foiling.

The second issue is whether the proposed new Governance model for World Sailing will be accepted.

The proposal does go a long way to addressing the Conflicts of Interest which riddle the world body like cancer. But, it does place more power in the hands of a CEO and splits the current Council into two entities - one of which handles Olympic matters only.

Many of the representatives at the Annual Conference will be only too well aware the current Council structure does provide a backstop against the Executive and Board, particularly when they go against the advice of expert committees without good reason. That lack of trust is the fuel of resistance to wide-ranging governance change.

The Finn class currently does not appear on the Events slate for the 2024 Olympics. The exclusion of males weighing more than 85kgs from Marseille is regarded as acceptable collateral damage, by gender equality hardliners.

The Finn class organisation has put up several submissions which open the door for it and above-average weight males to be on the start line in Marseille. Whether any of those options get support remains to be seen.

In yet another verse in the Mixed Two-person Offshore Keelboat opera, a joint submission from the Chairs of the Equipment Committee and Oceanic and Offshore Committee attempts to lock the decision-making process over the vexed Equipment issue.

The Submission proposes that a set of criteria for classes to be used in both regional training and selection published by December 2020 along with "examples of equipment which meet the criteria." The Submission proposes that a second set of criteria will also be published by December 31, 2020 "that Equipment for the Olympic Event shall meet."

Then three years later the Council (presumably the Olympic Council under the proposed governance model), will choose the keelboat to be used for the event in Marseille in 2024.

Of course, the whole event hinges around being able to make the offshore boat decision in complete secrecy, which is a massive ask of World Sailing - let alone when there are supplier negotiations involved.

The criteria-based approach takes World Sailing away from its previous position of naming suitable classes and then picking one of those for the Olympic event. While not a perfect method, at least an astute choice could be made at a regional level, knowing what had been approved for Europe/France from where the offshore keelboat will most likely come.

Missing from the Submission is what happens come 2028 and the Los Angeles Olympics. Do a new set of criteria get devised and promulgated? Does the 2024 Equipment get ditched?

It would seem that the selection of the Equipment will be paper-based, with no Evaluation Trials held as has been the requirement for four of the 2024 Olympic Events, so far.

Of course, the issue for the national bodies trying to put together a 2024 campaign in the Mixed Offshore boat is one of crew weight. Will the chosen class suit Whales or Whippets? Given that World Sailing concedes that conditions in Marseille are likely to be light, the latter is more likely.

Most competitive one-design keelboat classes now stipulate a maximum crew weight - will this be one of the criteria to be announced, for the Olympic Offshore keelboat in December 2020?

If so, what happens with countries who have already purchased boats for training in the seven months from the December 2023 announcement, to the start of the 2024 Olympic regatta? Do they get dropped onto what will be a flooded market?

Or will World Sailing lock in the 2024 Mixed Offshore Equipment for Los Angeles 2028?

The nagging issue is whether the Mixed Offshore event will be a one-Olympic wonder as was the Women's Match Racing in 2012?

The logic behind the change is stated to allow "recently introduced" Equipment, or for the Equipment lists to be "continually updated". That is the very thing that sailors and national bodies want to avoid - the constant fiddling and adjustment that just creates uncertainty, and helps those with inside knowledge to gain further advantage.

And all for a very expensive Olympic event which has yet to stage a World Championship.

However, the irony of the Bermuda World Conference is that it began with a forum on Women's participation in Sailing, and will likely end with the confirmation of an Event slate for 2024 which excludes above average weight male sailors. Worse, it is a deliberate exclusion made with full knowledge of its effect from the outset.

Related Articles

Sail-World NZ: July 9, 2020 - Te Aihe images
Welcome to Sail-World.com's New Zealand e-magazine for July 9, 2020 Welcome to Sail-World.com's New Zealand e-magazine for July 9, 2020 Posted today at 6:19 am
Some days you're lucky. Others you're blessed.
Thanks to the AST, and the Coffs Harbour YC, we are delighted to bring you these images. With many, many thanks to the Australian Sailing Team, and the delightful members of the Coffs Harbour Yacht Club, we are delighted to bring you these images. Posted on 4 Jul
Sail-World NZ news : June 30 - The Week that Was
Latest newsletter from Sail-World New Zealand, with the top stories covering the America's Cup Latest newsletter from Sail-World New Zealand, with the top stories covering the America's Cup along with the latest Editorial covering the rumours circulating that the America's Cup could be compressed/delayed/postponed - and why this can't happen. Posted on 2 Jul
Sail-World NZ: June 30, 2020
June 30: Auckland's AC75 fleet doubles..Winter series get going...Jim Young remembered Welcome to Sail-World.com's New Zealand e-magazine for June 30, 2020 Posted on 30 Jun
An interesting cluster develops
So Jeanneau's Sun Fast 3600 has certainly been a bit of a giant killer, especially short-handed. So Jeanneau's Sun Fast 3600 has certainly been a bit of a giant killer, especially short-handed. Races like the 5500nm Melbourne to Osaka lie as testament to that. Posted on 28 Jun
Cruising's no different
Just like everything else on the planet, cruising has undergone a major shake up Just like everything else on the planet, cruising has undergone a major shake up in recent times. We do feel for everyone who has been aboard and had to adapt, improvise and conquer, as a result of it. Posted on 23 Jun
X2 by four
Here is Part IV of the development of the marvellous X2 by Farr Here is Part IV of the development of the marvellous X2 by Farr Yacht Design. Posted on 15 Jun
Let's go racing
Perhaps heightened by all that we have gone through to date, and yet to conquer when it arrives... The joy of the new. Perhaps heightened by all that we have gone through to date, and are yet to conquer when whatever arrives, there is a distinct latent desire to crank it right up. Posted on 14 Jun
Sail-World NZ news : June 12 - The Week that Was
Latest newsletter from Sail-World NZ, with the top stories covering the America's Cup and more Read the latest newsletter from Sail-World New Zealand, with the top stories covering the America's Cup along with the latest Editorial covering the entry of America's Cup Challengers into New Zealand Posted on 14 Jun
Sail-World NZ: June 12, 2020
Welcome to Sail-World.com's New Zealand e-magazine for June 12, 2020 Welcome to Sail-World.com's New Zealand e-magazine for June 12, 2020 Posted on 11 Jun
MBW newsletters (top)